Scriptum Manchester: limits and constraints in the peer review process

[yala (jon r)]

Continuing the discussion from Scriptum Manchester: Event types:

@mark.burton

There seems to be a limit on the number of papers that can form part of a special session. Please can this be removed? (@vliegey also requested this).

I would like to consider this change request plus

Scriptum Manchester: co-authors required for academic session

You need to enter name + email + abstract for at least 3 co-authors to validate your academic session submission. Can we make it non-compulsory (optional) like for the activist and artistic ones? @yala @mark.burton @mladen

and

Scriptum Manchester: Each account can only submit one session/individual paper?

Can we change this limit to 3 per account? Is it a simple modification or more complex codding would be required? If not, people would simply create several accounts… @yala @mark.burton @mladen

together, since they are all connected to the design of the peer review process.

The question here, plus the other two requests, are they still relevant to your case, and do they still need adjustments?

[mark.burton]

Yes please @yala. We need these changes. cc. @mladen @vliegey

[yala (jon r)]

Hi @ponder, would you have capacity these days to implement the requested changes above?

I could make myself available in the beginning of next week, also for a meeting on Tuesday in Oberrieden, if possible for you.

[yala (jon r)]

@mark.burton I got notice from @ponder that he won’t be available for development this month. I might be able to spend some time on these refinements of the workflows only by the end of the month, and will keep you posted here.